Golden Era for US Billionaires: Why the Economic Structure Perpetuates Income Disparity
To numerous Americans, the financial landscape over the last half-decade has been challenging. Prices have soared while salaries remains stagnant. High mortgage rates have made buying a home a dismal prospect. The unemployment rate has been gradually increasing.
Many Americans have indicated they're putting off major life decisions, including having kids or switching jobs, because of the instability. But for a very small group of people, the last five years couldn't have been any better.
Wealth Explosion
The fortune of the world's billionaires grew 54% in 2020, at the climax of the pandemic. And even during all the market volatility, the stock market has only continued to grow. This increase has primarily advantaged just a limited group of Americans: 10% of the population controls 93% of stock market wealth.
Despite the imbalance as this division seems, it's the system working as it is presently configured.
"Affluent individuals have purchased their jets, they've bought their multiple houses and mansions, but now they're acquiring senators and media outlets," explained inequality researcher Chuck Collins. "We're now stepping into this other chapter of extreme wealth extraction where the wealthy are exploiting the system of inequality."
Analyzing Income Brackets
To help others understand what exactly it means to be "affluent" in the US, Collins utilizes a concept from journalist Robert Frank who, in a 2007 book on the rich, conceptualized the different levels of wealth as "Richistan" villages: Wealth Borough, Lower Richistan, Middle Richistan, Upper Richistan and Billionaireville.
To modernize the concept, Collins classifies these "affluence districts" based on income levels:
- At the lowest tier, Affluent Town, are the 10 million Americans who have a household income of at least $110,000 and an overall wealth of over $1.5m.
- The villages get more exclusive as wealth goes up: Lower Richistan has 2.6 million households who have wealth between $6m and $13m.
- Middle Richistan has 1.3 million households who have assets worth an average of $37m.
- Upper Richistan, made up of 130,000 Americans (roughly the size of a small city) has between $60m to $1bn in wealth.
In total, the residents of these villages make up the top 10% of the wealth income distribution, about 14 million Americans altogether, though their experiences vary dramatically.
"You could be in Lower Richistan, and you're still sitting in the coach section of a commercial plane," Collins explained. "Whereas in Upper Richistan, you're using a private jet. That's a really different cultural experience. You fly private, you have no interest in the commercial aviation system. You don't care if the whole system collapses – you're set."
Extreme Affluence Consequences
The highest hill in "Richistan" is Billionaireville, which is made up of about 800 American billionaires who are some of the world's richest. The power that this group has far surpasses those who are simply affluent, let alone the average American who doesn't inhabit "Richistan" at all.
But Collins thinks the activist mantra "end extreme wealth" misses the point and has a "hint of elimination" to it.
"It's the difference between private conduct and a system of rules," Collins explained. "We should be focused on an economic system that funnels so much wealth upward to the billionaires."
Fortune Building Strategies
To understand how wealth at the billionaire level works, Collins separates it into four parts: acquiring fortune, defending the wealth, government influence and extreme wealth removal.
When many Americans think about wealth, they usually think only about the first step, Collins said. People can create a modest amount of wealth through starting or running a successful business, which could get them admission in Affluent Town.
But getting to Billionaireville requires substantial commitment and tactics in those next three steps. Collins describes what he calls the "fortune security field": the tax lawyers, accountants and wealth managers who use their expertise to ensure that the super rich are being calculated about their taxes.
"Wealth defense professionals use a wide variety of tools such as legal entities, foreign deposits, undisclosed businesses, philanthropic entities and other mechanisms to hold assets," he explains.
Government Power and Extreme Wealth Removal
To advance a wealth defense strategy, a family needs government backing. Wealth of over $40m becomes political power, Collins says, and can be used to defend wealth and ensure continued growth.
The ultimate step is a different kind of wealth accumulation, one that Collins calls "hyper extraction" to describe how the wealthy have come to affect nearly every single part of an Americans' everyday life largely through private equity, which allows wealthy individuals to invest in private companies.
"Private equity is searching for those corners of the economy where they can increase profits a little bit harder," Collins said. "One thing I don't think people comprehend is these billionaire private-equity funds are what happens when so much wealth is accumulated in so few hands, and they can basically shift and say, 'Where else can we extract profits out of the economy?' Healthcare? Great. Mobile home parks? These people can't go anywhere, [so] you can raise their rents."
Tangible Effects
The consequences of this inequality go beyond the wealth getting wealthier. It's about people facing higher costs for their healthcare, rent and vet bills without seeing any significant salary growth. And Collins said the suffering and anger of this kind of society can lead to profound dissatisfaction.
"The most powerful affluent rulers understand people are being excluded [and] are economically suffering," Collins said, adding that right-leaning leaders have been good at accessing a potent "fake grassroots movement".
Policy Situation
The contradiction, Collins points out in his book, is that elected representatives have appointed a succession of billionaires to government roles. Along with tech billionaires who had temporary but significant roles overseeing massive cuts to the federal workforce, other crucial appointments for commerce, treasury, education and the interior are also all billionaires.
This administrative framework, along with help from political partners, helped pass significant fiscal policies, which will make permanent tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations.
The Path Forward
While legislative bodies continue to argue that foreign entry and bad trade agreements are the source of everyone's economic problems, "the challenge is: Will the alternative political group, which has also been controlled by the billionaires and big money, be able to meaningfully address the underlying harms?" Collins said.
Liberal leaders, he argues, know what policies are needed to "alter economic flow", including substantial modifications to the tax system, boosting the minimum wage and strengthening unions.
"It was so, so close, and the bill really did embody the will of the bulk of people who really want lawmakers to fix some of these critical challenges," Collins said. "Wealthy influence is not about developing so much as blocking. It's easier to block than it is to make something substantial take place, but the institutional knowledge is there. We know what that looks like."
Collins is hopeful that there can be change, but said it would require continuous government action.
"It may be sooner than expected that the pendulum swings back, and then it really is about sustaining a continuous public campaign to make progress on this profound imbalance we're living in," he said. "We can address this. It is solvable."