🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an international accord created to protect women from abuse, covering family violence, following prolonged and intense discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in Riga this past week to oppose the decision. The final authority now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring governments to establish legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of exiting from the convention. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant setback for women's rights.

Political Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have argued that its focus on gender equality undermines traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a action sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent vote has provoked broad outcry both inside the country and internationally.

22,000 people have endorsed a national petition calling for the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a protest for the coming week, charging lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that Latvia had made a hasty choice driven by false information. He described it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty four years ago, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could potentially return the bill for further review if he has objections.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal requirements, "considering governmental and judicial factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," stated a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse rates have been increasing in multiple European countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could affect comparable discussions in additional member states